Advent of 'Haki Yetu' Era in Kenya: Rights with responsibility

Since the 2007 elections in Kenya, and the violence that followed, the phrase 'haki yetu' has gained wide acceptance and application. Nevertheless it is coupled with misuse when rights are claimed yet they do not exist. I find it weird that even children will shout 'haki yao' when they have no idea about the rights purportedly claimed.

In Human rights, discourse there exists rights holders and duty bearers. The state takes primary responsibility in promoting and protecting fundamental rights and freedoms, citizens have their part - claim rights with manners. Section 70 of the Kenyan Constitution and Articles 27 to 29 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, are clear on the duties of citizens. In principle citizens must respect the rights of other human being and promote tolerance.

I don't buy the framework of 'haki yetu' in its present form. That is why Kenyans will burn vehicles, kill neighbours, steal, and mutilate infrastructure all in the name of rights. It is not a surprise that the University of Nairobi is still closed for undergraduate students. That is why we will 'demonise' the government on corruption yet we are TKK people all the way without a coma, from our door steps.

While i verily believe in fundamental rights and freedoms, lets not blow things out of proportion. In the non-violence movement of Mahatma Gandhi, the principle was to respect all just laws and only disrespect unjust, draconian and discriminatory laws. If we uphold the rights of others, the government will respect our collective rights. Citizens lets all be warned, we have a duty.

Spread the word, Cheers.